Cultural Recovery Meets Futurology
The interesting thing about reading Evie Shockley's “Separation Anxiety” after Kodwo Eshun's “Further Considerations on Afrofuturism” – one after the other – is that there is a brief moment of reflection during which the reader realizes that they contradict each other. Among other things, Eshun writes about how Black history can be used to write the Black future – the very definition of Afrofuturism, “back to the past and black to the future” – in optimistic if scholarly and somewhat unenthusiastic terms. Shockley, however, writes out a future in which this cannot happen, where Black history is the future, represented in a chilling statement from [P]eaches on page 60:
“all these authenticity rules! gotta have eighty percent historical content in each program. can't change not a step in performing some nineteenth or twentieth century dance. it's like we're fossils, walking around. I need to see if maybe black dance got a future.”
Essentially, the characters are living in a situation in which even artistic representations are decided upon by the faceless government – she's talking about dance here, but it can easily be assumed that it applies universally, or rather, it would be extremely odd if it did not, for obvious and irrelevant reasons. What it hints at, with all the subtlety of a steak knife, is that they also live in a society with a legally defined history – not merely the occasional whitewashing or revisionism/wishful thinking that shows up in contemporary middle school textbooks, but a rigid definition of something that is by its very nature subjective or vague – that evidently ignores the idea of a more recent history (example: hip-hop and rap not being considered “real music” in favor of Elvis or such), or possibly even a suggestion that there is nothing in recent history with artistic merit (a self-satisfying prophesy). To put it simply, this is another way to read and interpret the definition of Afrofuturism above: pessimistic and all but ignoring any real understanding of history, but likely presented very enthusiastically to get by the various levels of government.
There is one thing Eshun and Shockley both ignore: the question of language. Eshun would particularly have to be aware of it as a nebulous construct at best (he's British, after all), and Shockley, aside from pulling the age-old trope of all-lowercase lettering, does not directly bring it up – although it isn't unheard of for classes to be taught in a particular language/dialect. Either way, language would evolve, for good or for ill, under either application of “back to the past, black to the future”, and it is odd to not see a reference in either work – probably, Eshun is looking up a bit too carefully, and Shockley is using too much of the present in her distortion. Which brings up another issue: thought 2095 is the date given for the establishment of the [DECC], the social and cultural background is too skewed to be believable (for the same reason that there will never be a serious anthology titled One Million AD) as it implies that the state of things managed to get much, much worse after the current generation – which, given the advancing state of medicine, will make up the most active oldsters to date. For this, it might be easier to consider “Separation Anxiety” a first-person record of an alternate reality 22nd century(?) rather than the usual “significant distortion of the present”.