A disturbing trend

http://www.angryzenmaster.com/2009/02/25/pentagon-wants-to-deploy-autonomous-death-bots/ and http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/127484/?page=entire

I posted a response on the first page, but decided to do so here as well. Yes, I'm "B.D" - a name lifted from "Megazone 23" 1 and 2. This is just one angle...


There are two things I’m worried about here - appearance, and jamming (interference as well, but that’s a completely separate post). I’m worried more about jamming. Let’s say that, to prevent hijacking, the signal is heavily encoded. Let’s say that each unit answers to a slightly different frequency - or, assuming they covered their bases, a completely different code. What happens when the signal is jammed? Do they explode, to prevent them from falling into the wrong hands (or competitors)? Or do they simply stop working, so as to avoid unintended deaths/collateral damage? More that likely the second. (A third, really stupid idea, would be to go into ‘Dalek-mode’, shooting anything that moves.)

As with drones, these machines are intended to penetrate, ideally with the operator within a certain distance. And if the operator dies/gets killed? Shouldn’t happen; that would defeat the point of the Unmanned Unit. So the operator would be some distance away, requiring some form of wireless/radio to communicate with the UU. And if there’s a distance without wired communication, there’s the possibility of jamming.

So let’s say the signal has been jammed. There is now an UU where it cannot be easily recovered (since the whole point is to not run the risk of combat losses, it’s alone), with at least $100,000 worth of parts that would be _very_ useful to the enemy for whatever reason. The enemy now has a usable frame, electronics (and code?), possibly armor, and (pick one) an M249/40mm GL/M202 that can be electronically fired - which this increasingly faceless entity can either convert for their own use or sell to their sponsors, should they have them.

And how to stop the UU itself? There’s probably two main ways to sell a box o’ fun like this - open (parts are replaceable) or closed (the robot is completely sealed from outside disturbances). Closed would be more profitable for the company, and would render the above situation less likely, but it would be freakin’ expensive. Open would be cheaper for the military, depending on the on-the-ground situation, but would make the UU accessible (easier to repair, easier to salvage). Stopping the UU might be as simple as ripping off the power source or cutting some wires, easily replaced.

So now we’re looking at a machine that can be stopped in at least one way. How about appearance? The one in the picture is a black tread-motivated death machine with at least two points of articulation above the body (the camera, and the main swivel), probably more. What happens if it is a) flipped over a la Robot Wars or b) surrounded by suddenly-appearing walls of metal? Or smoke/chaff?

I took one look at the article and came up with this; better countermeasures will crop up during actual use. UUs are a bad idea, in the many ways ED-209 (RoboCop) was a bad idea.